I’m not buying the argument that banning circumcision is a violation of religious freedom, because such freedom must involve being able to choose for themselves.
Title says it all. Apparently Norway is about to ban non-medical circumcision of infant boys. Good for them. Here is the article.
Can I suggest that you clarify that the suggested ban is for non-medical circumcision of _infant boys_. As it is now the ban suggested ban appears more encompassing than it really is.
If you are of legal age you would still be free to get a circumcision.
Can I suggest that you clarify that the suggested ban is for non-medical circumcision of _infant boys_. As it is now the ban suggested ban appears more encompassing than it really is.
ReplyDeleteIf you are of legal age you would still be free to get a circumcision.
Ugh, you are right. Changed that. Thanks.
ReplyDelete