Because Circumcision is cheaper....

Oh my. Found via reddit, here one of the proponents of circumcision as a means to fight HIV in Africa uses flawless logic in one of her arguments:

As Dr. Essex has indicated, male circumcision is much cheaper than condoms + education (one male circumcision in southern Africa is < U$100 and each condom costs almost U$1.00

So the argument for circumcision against condoms is that it is cheaper...keeping in mind that

-- although circumcised men should still use condoms consistently).

I rest my case...